A Mind of Our Own and A Private Universe

Jill Mason's picture
If you in my cohort haven’t watched these yet, I’d HIGHLY recommend them. They really make you question the assumptions we make about what our students already know when we are instructing them. In A Private Universe, MIT graduates are asked to light a bulb using a wire and a battery. Most cannot. In A Mind of Our Own, high school students are asked why the seasons change and why the moon is sometimes full, crescent, or not appearing at all. They do attempt to answer the questions, but their assumptions are wrong so the results (their answers) are wrong as well.
 
Sometimes I’m honestly baffled as to how I can teach something so thoroughly (in my opinion), and the students have been paying attention as well as 7th graders ever do, yet the concept, when I ask them about it later, has completely eluded them. I have tried posting the objective every single day in class and talking to them about whether they learned it, I have tried to create better assessments (and their answers are usually right on the day we have the lesson) and many other methods of increasing comprehension, yet certain concepts they just do not understand.
 
One recent example involved teaching the CTE, Intro-Business students how to fill out a job application. We discussed the concepts of it the day before and I told them that they would have to find some references who could vouch for their character and/or their ability to work well. I told them that these references could not be relatives, but rather teachers or scout leaders or people for whom they had worked/volunteered. Due to last year’s experience with this class, I knew that I had to pound this information into their little heads because no one the previous year seemed to grasp the concept that references can’t be relatives.
 
The next day as we were filling out our applications, my first period students asked “Is my mom a reference?” or “Is my aunt a reference?” I was stumped! I looked at the application. Under each reference, it asked for RELATIONSHIP. We probably all know that RELATIONSHIP on a job application means HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS PERSON? To a kid in 7th grade, however, relationship means someone to whom you are related. They did not identify what I had been talking about at length the day before to what we were doing the current day because of that prior knowledge. To them, I was certainly talking about relatives! That was my first incorrect assumption: My students understand what the word RELATIONSHIP means as it applies to a reference. One thing the videos talk about is that when a student believes something (such as relationship = talking about relatives), it is extremely difficult for them to change that belief/knowledge in their heads. I really need to talk a lot more to them and especially have them talk back to me about this concept of RELATIONSHIP.
 
 My next incorrect assumption: My students know what the word REFERENCE means. All the while I was explaining that a reference had to be someone to whom they were not related, for whom they had worked, etc etc etc; it went in one ear and out the other because for the most part, they had no idea prior knowledge of what a REFERENCE was! If 7th graders don’t understand a word I use in a sentence, they are likely just going to smile and nod as if they know what I’m talking about, assuming that they will ‘get it’ eventually. I need to tell them what I mean!
 
I have started asking students more questions as we discuss the process of filling out a job application: What is a reference? What do I mean by ‘relationship’? Who would be an acceptable reference? What do references do for you? Why do you need to collect references? Do you think you should ask a reference ahead of time if you can use/him her on your job application? This really cleared up a lot of the misunderstandings, but some of those beliefs are so ingrained that I have to be patient as about three to five students per class ask me the same question: Is my mom a reference? Different types of instruction (discussion with me, discussion in their teams of three to four, and instruction sheets to go along with the application) have helped as well. It’s really no extra time to work out the lesson this way (still one class period), and their results have greatly improved.
 
Again, watch the videos if you get a chance. They’re really enlightening, interesting and entertaining!
Rhonda Adams's picture

I watched this video and

I watched this video and YES! it was disturbing.  Especially considering I am a science teacher and we cover most of these concepts presented in the video.  I then started to reflect on my own teaching and ask myself, "are my students going to remember this information 20 years from now?"  Not having taught long enough to see the outcome, I have had to do some soul searching. 
 
Here's what I found out. It's not the information you give them, but the experiences you give them.  What was the setting in which they (the Ivy League students) were exposed to the reason for a crescent moon?  I watched the video again after reading your blog, and I realized that no one explored these questions or experiences.  I have since gotten less lecture-oriented with my students and more experience-oriented with my students (even more than I used to do).  Hopefully in 20 years, if they at least remember that science was fun and exciting, maybe that's enough for me.  (I know, I'm such an optimist) :)
 
But, as for the misconceptions, yes, it is always shocking to me what I think one way, my students think another.  I guess that's what makes us good teachers.  We observe that something didn't click, and adjust.  Great job on the blog however!  Love it!
Heather 's picture

A Private Universe + 20 years

Hi There! I was searching the internet for a different reference to "A Private Universe", and came across Jill's blog entry and then Rhonda and Jennifer's comments. I wanted to throw in my two cents worth. Just over twenty years ago, I was interviewed for A Private Universe. I gave marvelously wrong answers, and learned a whole bunch. (Yep, I'm that Heather.) Eventually, I went on to get a degree in Physics. Rhonda you asked what will your students remember in twenty years about your science class. I remember the more hands on, manipulative lessons where we made mistakes, got it wrong, and then made it right. I remember the indepth questions where even the teachers had to think to figure out the "How" and the "Why". I remember the things I got wrong, and then had to struggle through better than the things that came easily. Best of Luck! Heather.
Jennifer Sinclair's picture

Jill, I really enjoyed your

Jill, I really enjoyed your thoughts.  It was also impossible for me to watch that video without thinking about how it applied to me and my own teaching. 
 
Jennifer Sinclair

Disclaimer

Any opinions expressed here, except as specifically noted, are those of the individual authors or commenters and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Department of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, the Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services, or Utah State University.